Archive for June, 2003

P.H.B.

My boss Ted* can never be wrong. Whenever backed into a corner, realizing that he is wrong, Ted poses a bogus question that can only be answered one way, and which, when answered, at first thought seems to bolster his position, but which is totally irrelevant. Example? Sure:

Ted is the manager of the IT division at our public organization whose responsibility includes the IT Help Desk. My job is to schedule the Help Desk work that comes in so that everything is fixed in a timely manner, and efficiently. We don’t want to send three technicians to work on three different problems at the same off-site location; we’ll send one tech to take care of all three, prioritizing as appropriate. This is an extremely simplified description, and I have many other responsibilities, but this gives you an idea of one of my primary duties.

I have a meeting every morning with all the field technicians, local technicians, and phone support technicians, where we go over all outstanding work and brainstorm on difficult problems, and I reassign things as necessary. At a recent meeting, Ted tried to make a point about our opinion of a problem vs. the customers’ opinion of the problem. He used a recent trouble call from a conference room as an example. While we may have interpreted the problem as dead batteries in a wireless keyboard, or maybe the frequency of this keyboard being changed inadvertently by the user, the customer’s real problem is that he cannot control his PowerPoint presentation. I completely agree with this part of his argument.

I used as an example a recent problem I was troubleshooting where, on a customer’s primary PC, large .TIF images were taking up to two seconds to open from a document server on the network. When the same images were opened on a dedicated research PC (identically configured), they opened in about 1/2 second. I explained to the group that, at first, two seconds seemed plenty quick to me. Before I was able to add the fact that I am still troubleshooting, since 1 1/2 seconds is truly a big difference when you open thousands of images a day as this customer does, I was cut off. Ted said that not only did he think that my opinion was completely irrelevant, but that he was stunned that I would share that opinion with the rest of the group. After all, it didn’t matter at all what I thought, as along as we met the needs of the customer. I (mostly) agreed with him on that point, but explained that I completely disagreed with him about having an opinion and sharing it with the rest of the group in this informal pow-wow we have each morning.

I brought up how we, including Ted himself, routinely make fun of a certain customer who calls the Help Desk often, for mostly simple problems that have been solved many times before. We joke about her to each other, never to anyone else, and we are always nothing but professional when dealing with her time and again. We obviously ALL have an opinion of her, and we share that opinion with the others in our group, but we never let it compromise the service we provide. I had, in effect, shown him that he does the very thing for which he was currently berating me.

His response was to bring up an article he read recently about how many organizations are outsourcing their Help Desk. How it would probably save the organization money to farm it out, at the expense of customer service. If we are going to start second guessing the customer’s real problems, and inserting our own interpretations of what the problem is, and having a different opinion than the customer, then we might as well let some call center in India answer the phones and troubleshoot the problems that come in. Is that what we really want? Will that be the best thing for the organization, service-wise? He actually asked these two questions of us.

How can you answer loaded questions like those? Obviously, the answer to both questions is no. Someone walking into the meeting when these questions were asked would think that we had been suggesting the opposite until Ted showed us the light. Of course his questions had no bearing on the previous example I was sharing, but because we were “forced” into answering his questions in the way he wanted them answered, it made it seem as if we were acknowledging that he was completely right about the whole thing from the beginning.

Some people just piss me off.

Not his real name of course.

Add comment June 24th, 2003

Refill cups

I drink a lot. A whole lot. Not alcohol, but Diet Pepsi. Not that I don’t drink alcohol, I do drink occasionally, but only at the clichéd “social event.” I drink so infrequently, for example, that we just gave our neighbors a case of beer that was left over from our Super Bowl party. When I do have the occasion to drink, however, I drink a lot. Remember all the tequila I drank when down in Cabo San Lucas? I don’t either. I was told I had a lot of fun.

But I drink a lot of Diet Pepsi. Some days I will go through five 44oz cups. Using a plastic refillable 7-11 Super Big Gulp cup is the way to go. Why pay $1.09 when refills are just $.69? This leads to one of my biggest pet peeves.

You are requested to notify the clerk if you have a refill cup before refilling it, which is to prevent every yahoo who buys a drink in a brand new plastic cup from asking for the refill price. This is an understandable and reasonable request.

There is one Chevron store I visit every morning on the way to work, however, where they seem to be a bit unclear on the concept. Every morning, I bring in my sun-faded, 7-11 plastic cup and get a Diet Pepsi. Every morning the same cashier asks me, in an accusatory “You’re trying to get a drink at a refill price, aren’t you?” tone, if this is a new cup or a refill. I can’t bring myself to point out the fact that not only is the cup very obviously not new, it is not even a Chevron cup.

Add comment June 11th, 2003

Metallica rocks

I bought Metallica’s new St. Anger CD today. I didn’t even realize it had been released already. Amazon has it for $12.98, which is a hell of a deal, considering it also comes with a DVD of them performing all the songs while practicing and warming up.

The CD kicks ass, as any true fan already knows. I’ve heard a lot of reviews knocking it, saying it sounds too different, it doesn’t sound like the old Metallica. I agree, and that’s one of the reasons I love it. I think Metallica are one of the bravest rock bands around. They obviously aren’t afraid to try new things, and I appreciate that the new CD doesn’t sound like the old ones. If you want something that sounds like their old stuff, then listen to their old stuff (which I still do).

The new CD has a raw, slightly unpolished sound that is welcome. It doesn’t sound like four musicians in a studio re-recording every chord and every word until it is flawless; it sounds like four guys jamming. Don’t get me wrong, the CD’s sound quality is perfect, you need only compare the same songs on the DVD, where the songs are sometimes off-key and notes are sometimes missed, to see that they did spend a lot of time in the studio. However, they took care to leave well enough alone once the songs sounded great. Rock and Roll is not supposed to be perfection.

Add comment June 8th, 2003


Calendar

June 2003
S M T W T F S
« May   Aug »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category